From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-29 13:44:19
At 11:49 PM 1/27/2002, joel de guzman wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jesse Jones" :
>> Aren't paths an implementation detail? What about OS's now and in the
>> future that deprecate paths? I don't see why we can't create a higher
>> level class that works just as well as a path-centric class, but also
>> works well on the Mac OS.
>Exactly! That's why I suggested conversion to and from a standard well
>defined format such as a URI (Universal Resource Identifier).
That makes a lot of sense to me. I started to look at
http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ to get an idea of what was involved, but
quickly got lost in the details. Which scheme are you suggesting?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk