Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Maciej Sobczak (maciej_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 07:36:17

Next message: Ken Hagan: "Re: [boost] Re: the first version of abstract path manipulation c lass (interface)"
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] boost thread on solaris"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"
Next in thread: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"
Reply: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"

Hi,

David Abrahams wrote:

> Have you looked at this work: http://www.zib.de/weiser/vtl/?
>
> -Dave

Wow... I'm impressed.
I didn't know somebody has put so much work into this. :-(

Anyway, I do not think my effort was useless - the bare comparison of
archives' contents shows that the same concept (with the same name...)
was implemented really differently.

Still waiting for your opinions.

Regards,
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.maciejsobczak.com

Next message: Ken Hagan: "Re: [boost] Re: the first version of abstract path manipulation c lass (interface)"
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] boost thread on solaris"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"
Next in thread: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"
Reply: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] VIEW: STL-compatible utility class -> any interest?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk