Re: [boost] Objections to removing the old smart pointer class templates?

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 15:42:36

On 1/30/02 12:40 PM, "Rainer Deyke" <root_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> IMO 'memory' is a bad name since the smart pointer classes deal with
> fully constructed objects, not raw memory.  Maybe
> <boost/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.hpp>?

Note that "Memory" is the category that Boost documentation puts the
smart_ptr library in: <http://www.boost.org/libs/libraries.htm#Memory>.

    -- Darin