From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 15:42:36
On 1/30/02 12:40 PM, "Rainer Deyke" <root_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> IMO 'memory' is a bad name since the smart pointer classes deal with
> fully constructed objects, not raw memory. Maybe
Note that "Memory" is the category that Boost documentation puts the
smart_ptr library in: <http://www.boost.org/libs/libraries.htm#Memory>.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk