Re: [boost] Re: Did anyone *ever* get the current version of Boost.Python running...

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-01 19:52:24

----- Original Message -----
From: "sfranke2000" <franke_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:20 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Did anyone *ever* get the current version of
Boost.Python running...

> --- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> > The new sources are under development. They get built from
> libs/python while
> > the official release gets built from libs/python/build.
>
> Ahh, now I understand. Ok, building from libs/python/build
> yields the same result than from the root (that parse error again),
> so at least this riddle is solved.
>
> > No, you're using the old one again.
>
> Believe me, there's now only one jam.exe on my harddisk and that's
> definitely the one from the current prebuild. It seems that this
> is just outdated.

You're right. The parse error is a little misleading. The problem is that
this Jamfile relies on support for local rules. There's no need for that, so
I'll take it out for the time being. Please checkout the Jamfile anew and
try again.

Sorry,
-Dave