From: Synge Todo (wistaria_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-05 13:24:09
Dear Darin and Andrei,
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [boost] Submission: Fixed-Capacity STL Containers Library
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:21:27 -0800
> > I think that we should look into fixed_capacity_vector implementations
> > don't behave this way; for one thing, it would make them more compatible
> > with vector, and for another, it would make them more efficient.
I should confess that I've never thought about that. I have no idea
if it's possible to implement it in such a way without using dynamic
> I agree. The fixed-capacity vector should allocate raw memory, not T[N]. The
> current implementation would be suitable for PODs only.
By the way, what does 'POD' mean?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk