From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-07 20:32:53
--- In boost_at_y..., nbecker_at_f... wrote:
> Isn't the copy constructor redundant? Doesn't the default copy
> constructor do the correct thing?
You are right. Leftover from older implementations. Fixed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk