Re: [boost] must be explicit about private inheritance forIBM/VisualAge

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 12:10:27

----- Original Message -----
From: "Darin Adler" <darin_at_[hidden]>

> This is a bit annoying. It's standard idiom to inherit from noncopyable
like
> this, without explicitly saying "private".
>
> I guess we can prohibit this from Boost code to be compatible with the
> IBM/VisualAge compiler. But what do other Boost contributors think?

I'm annoyed too, but I wouldn't mind adding "private" where neccessary to
keep the brasswork shiny.

-Dave