From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 12:16:02
On 2/8/02 9:10 AM, "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm annoyed too, but I wouldn't mind adding "private" where neccessary to
> keep the brasswork shiny.
I found 12 different places where this would need to be added -- 2 or 3 of
them in struct definitions, so the inheritance is currently public in those
cases (not that that matters). Is it OK if I do it throughout instead of
waiting for individual library authors to do each one?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk