From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 12:17:28
From: "Darin Adler" <darin_at_[hidden]>
> On 2/8/02 3:11 AM, "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > IBM/VisualAge complains about the 'private' keywords omitted for
> > base-classes.
> This is a bit annoying. It's standard idiom to inherit from noncopyable
> this, without explicitly saying "private".
EDG remarks on it, too. I never omit the inheritance access myself, although
the noncopyable-as-keyword idiom is cleaner without it, granted.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk