Re: [boost] must be explicit about private inheritance forIBM/VisualAge

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 12:17:28

From: "Darin Adler" <darin_at_[hidden]>
> On 2/8/02 3:11 AM, "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > IBM/VisualAge complains about the 'private' keywords omitted for
> > base-classes.
>
> This is a bit annoying. It's standard idiom to inherit from noncopyable
like
> this, without explicitly saying "private".

EDG remarks on it, too. I never omit the inheritance access myself, although
the noncopyable-as-keyword idiom is cleaner without it, granted.