Re: Boost Documentation Templates

From: bill_kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-14 10:14:28

--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> I think it's pretty clear that this part of the standard falls into 
the same
> category as untested code (it almost certainly has bugs). It's not 
an
> unreasonable idea to think of hacking out any nonsense and coming 
up with
> our own alternative.

I agree, but I didn't want to hack it out until I determined if it 
was a "bug" or just my lack of understanding.  Which sections do you 
propose we 86?

Bill Kempf