Re: [boost] Re: Boost Documentation Templates

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-14 10:32:00

----- Original Message -----
From: "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: Boost Documentation Templates

> --- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> > I think it's pretty clear that this part of the standard falls into
> the same
> > category as untested code (it almost certainly has bugs). It's not
> an
> > unreasonable idea to think of hacking out any nonsense and coming
> up with
> > our own alternative.
>
> I agree, but I didn't want to hack it out until I determined if it
> was a "bug" or just my lack of understanding.  Which sections do you
> propose we 86?

Well I agree that it's worth doing a little research before deciding. Why
don't you make up a list of questions and send them to Andy Koenig? He's the
guy to know what this stuff means...

-Dave