From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-19 01:26:58
--- In boost_at_y..., nbecker_at_f... wrote:
> I'd like to see something like this added as well:
It's not a part of cycle iterator functionality. Moreover I don't
think we need more wrappers. cycle iterator adaptor could adapt any
iterator, no need to limit/forward container interface.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk