|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-27 17:44:14
Intel C++ uncovered the following with a warning:
------------------------
typedef int& r_type;
typedef const r_type cr_type;
------------------------
type_traits_test.hpp(278): warning #21: type qualifiers are meaningless in
this declaration
typedef const r_type cr_type;
^
------------------------
I wonder if we've been testing the right things?
I changed it to:
typedef int const& cr_type;
Everything seems to continue to pass.
On the other hand, the pragmas used to disable warnings with MSVC suggest
that this was intentional. Was it? A comment would be a big help, here.
-Dave
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
David Abrahams
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org) O__ ==
Pythonista (http://www.python.org) c/ /'_ ==
resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html (*) \(*) ==
email: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk