RE: [boost] Re: sockets Interface for address class

From: Iain.Hanson_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-02-28 15:05:18

In order to prevent char * being converted to std::string unnecessarily. I was 
not 100% sure that const char * version would be prefered over conversion to 
Sstd::string.

/ikh

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: sockets Interface for address class
Author:  jonkalb (jonkalb_at_[hidden]) at unix,mime
Date:    28/02/02 19:51

Why is this two parameter constructor explicit?
     
-----Original Message-----
From: Iain.Hanson_at_[hidden] [mailto:Iain.Hanson_at_[hidden]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:37 AM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: sockets Interface for address class
     
     
  explicit address ( const std::string & Address , port_type Port );
     
     
     
Info: http://www.boost.org  Send unsubscribe requests to: <mailto:boost-unsubscr
ibe_at_[hidden]> 
     
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
     
     

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.