From: Steve M. Robbins (steven.robbins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-15 09:11:49
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:49:14AM -0000, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> I believe a templated rational WILL be useful and will be used with 32 or 64
> bit integers, (or unlimited precision integers when available).
> Isn't the key advantage of rational is that results remain EXACT (no
> rounding etc)?
Yes, but that is only true if you use an arbitrary-precision integer
package. And only if you stick to using the four basic arithmetic ops
-- no sqrt(), no trig.
> And perhaps rationals are quick too?
Not if you use arbitrary-precision integers :-)
-- by Rocket to the Moon, by Airplane to the Rocket, by Taxi to the Airport, by Frontdoor to the Taxi, by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ... - They Might Be Giants
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk