Re: ublas & assert

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 02:08:13

--- In boost_at_y..., Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_s...> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2002 11:37, you wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Thursday 14 March 2002 11:20, jhrwalter wrote:
> > > > BTW, when are you planning to change size1() and size2() into
> > >
> > > num_rows and
> > >
> > > > num_cols (as suggested by Jeremy and IIRC you accepted)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reminder ;-) I'm not very happy with this 
change, as
> > > it breaks the libraries internal naming scheme, but if nobody
> > > objects, I'll change this soon.
> >
> > Well, as stated before I'd prefer size1() / size2().
> 
> we can have both. num_rows and num_columns could even be a free 
function 
> (fits in your recent strategy of prefering free to member functions 
(eg. 
> matrix::row -> row))
 
This seems to me like a good compromise.
 
Regards
 
Joerg