Re: [boost] Re: ublas & assert

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-14 07:24:10

On Thursday 14 March 2002 11:37, you wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Thursday 14 March 2002 11:20, jhrwalter wrote:
> > > BTW, when are you planning to change size1() and size2() into
> >
> > num_rows and
> >
> > > num_cols (as suggested by Jeremy and IIRC you accepted)
> >
> > Thanks for the reminder ;-) I'm not very happy with this change, as
> > it breaks the libraries internal naming scheme, but if nobody
> > objects, I'll change this soon.
>
> Well, as stated before I'd prefer size1() / size2().

we can have both. num_rows and num_columns could even be a free function 
(fits in your recent strategy of prefering free to member functions (eg. 
matrix::row -> row))