Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jaakko Jarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-20 11:45:20

> * If I can ignore the first and second argument using _3, why shouldn't I be
> able to ignore the second and the third argument using _1? What's so special
> about the last argument making it "non-ignoreable"?

Is there a solution where both would coexist.

Something like

ignore_trailing_arguments(_1 + _2)

with a shorter name?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at