From: Jaakko Jarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-20 11:45:20
> * If I can ignore the first and second argument using _3, why shouldn't I be
> able to ignore the second and the third argument using _1? What's so special
> about the last argument making it "non-ignoreable"?
Is there a solution where both would coexist.
ignore_trailing_arguments(_1 + _2)
with a shorter name?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk