Re: [boost] Re: Review: lambda library

From: joel de guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-20 19:29:43

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jaakko Jarvi" :

> > * If I can ignore the first and second argument using _3, why shouldn't I be
> > able to ignore the second and the third argument using _1? What's so special
> > about the last argument making it "non-ignoreable"?
> 
> Is there a solution where both would coexist.
> 
> Something like 
> 
> ignore_trailing_arguments(_1 + _2) 
> 
> with a shorter name?

Why not make that default and instead have:

    strict_arity(_1 + _2)

???

Regards,
--Joel