From: joel de guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-20 19:29:43
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaakko Jarvi" :
> > * If I can ignore the first and second argument using _3, why shouldn't I be
> > able to ignore the second and the third argument using _1? What's so special
> > about the last argument making it "non-ignoreable"?
> Is there a solution where both would coexist.
> Something like
> ignore_trailing_arguments(_1 + _2)
> with a shorter name?
Why not make that default and instead have:
strict_arity(_1 + _2)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk