Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Terekhov (TEREKHOV_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-08 10:17:46


> Instead of labelling Boost.threads a joke in your
> usenet post, why not put up sound arguments here.

Apart from the feedback/"arguments" (mainly: DO *NOT*
REINVENT THE WHEEL; See how THE STANDARD (POSIX/Pthreads)
does/defines this or that; *C* compatibility IS important,
and tiny technicalities w.r.t condvars/once-init/timedmutex/
cancel/exit and "alternative" sketchy stuff (thread_ptr/
mythread.c) aside) that I've already provided here (see the
boost devlist archives) since many, many months ago, you
may want to click on:

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3CB14C2F.349AEF75%40web.de

"Care to provide some "feedback"/"comments", folks?

 (I'll do it in the reply to this message sometime
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  later, and would greatly appreciate if you could
  be so kind and share your opinions too.)

 The library:
 http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/boost/boost/libs/thread/
 The docu: http://www.boost.org/libs/thread/doc/index.html

 Article: http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.htm?topic=current

 ====

 The Boost.Threads Library

 Bill Kempf

 Standard C++ threads are imminent. CUJ
 predicts they will derive from the Boost.Threads
 library, explored here by the eminent author.

 ------------------------------------------------
 ...."

regards,
alexander.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk