|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Terekhov (TEREKHOV_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-08 10:17:46
> Instead of labelling Boost.threads a joke in your
> usenet post, why not put up sound arguments here.
Apart from the feedback/"arguments" (mainly: DO *NOT*
REINVENT THE WHEEL; See how THE STANDARD (POSIX/Pthreads)
does/defines this or that; *C* compatibility IS important,
and tiny technicalities w.r.t condvars/once-init/timedmutex/
cancel/exit and "alternative" sketchy stuff (thread_ptr/
mythread.c) aside) that I've already provided here (see the
boost devlist archives) since many, many months ago, you
may want to click on:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3CB14C2F.349AEF75%40web.de
"Care to provide some "feedback"/"comments", folks?
(I'll do it in the reply to this message sometime
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
later, and would greatly appreciate if you could
be so kind and share your opinions too.)
The library:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/boost/boost/libs/thread/
The docu: http://www.boost.org/libs/thread/doc/index.html
Article: http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.htm?topic=current
====
The Boost.Threads Library
Bill Kempf
Standard C++ threads are imminent. CUJ
predicts they will derive from the Boost.Threads
library, explored here by the eminent author.
------------------------------------------------
...."
regards,
alexander.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk