From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 08:39:56
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> My suggestion is to add boost::bind (and boost::function, 'cause the
> combined are more than a sum of the parts) in the current "package" of
> libraries for consideration. Let the committee know about Lambda, but
> them the option to reject the big picture without necessarily
> I (user hat on) do want to get a standard lambda library, but at the
> time, I'll settle for a standard bind if this is the only thing that
> chance to pass through the committee.
I agree with Peter.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk