From: Sreekant Sreedharan (blue_panther_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 16:14:54
The intent of my post is _not_ to suggest Petal as an option. It is
obvious that my implementation is truely deficient in a lot of areas. If
that is so, Petal is indeed _not_ the answer to the problem.
But I am still left with a void... what is the answer?
Loki seems to satisfy quiet a few of these problems.. Is there meaning in
looking at it as a basis for our ideas?
As Gennadiy points out....
'First of all I would like to remark that I never meant to say any thing
against design patterns implementation in a code.'
My problem truely is the same, is there a way we can do this? If so how?
Is is that UML (and other related visual techniques) is the only standard
way of expressing patterns?
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk