From: Braden McDaniel (braden.n.mcdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-11 17:28:51
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:47:34 -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
> 1. It actually consists of a wide variety of mostly-independent library
I'll give you that one; but I don't see what bearing this has on the
> 2. Little or no attention is paid to binary compatibility between
> 3. Strictly speaking, source compatibility is broken frequently
It's not all that uncommon for projects in "alpha" mode operate like this.
Frankly, I think at some point the dust will need to settle and Boost will
need to add some rigor to its release process; but an installation story
need not be contingent upon this. In the meantime, users just need to be
warned of the shifting sands.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk