From: Powell, Gary (powellg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-12 11:13:58
Did I miss something, or is mpl up for review? Because there are a lot
of mpl reviews being posted.
Did I miss that Loki is up for review? Because its being compared to a
library which hasn't been released.
I had thought that Andrei asked for help, and I did volunteer some time,
and last I looked I was on the boost page.
Its really unfair to the library developers to have to justify every
nuance of the implementation if they aren't really ready.
Is there some hard rule that boost can't have two typelists? Why do we
have to have one mega all encompassing solution to all problems? Isn't
it possible to have a simpler typelist and a complex one? Screws and
nails, each has a use.
Also when we criticize libraries, we really come down hard on
implementation and it seems to me that we forget about the interface,
which as a user of a library is much more important.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk