From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 10:44:04
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicola Musatti" <objectway_at_[hidden]>
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > I'm afraid you're wrong. XTI is essentially a compiler which
> > representation of the interfaces and types that a program declares.
> > doesn't give you a replacement for RTTI. For example, it can't help
> > produce a representation of the type identifier for a derived class
> > polymorphic base.
> also be possible.
What does that mean?
> By the way, this appears to be the same set of slides
> BS presented at the ACCU conference:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk