From: Nicola Musatti (objectway_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 11:38:30
David Abrahams wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicola Musatti" <objectway_at_[hidden]>
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm afraid you're wrong. XTI is essentially a compiler which
> produces a
> > > representation of the interfaces and types that a program declares.
> > > doesn't give you a replacement for RTTI. For example, it can't help
> > > produce a representation of the type identifier for a derived class
> of a
> > > polymorphic base.
> > also be possible.
> What does that mean?
Apparently one line got sliced off my message; it was supposed to read:
also be possible.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk