Re: [boost] Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 11:37:39

From: "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]>
> > IMO, there is no "standard" intrusive pointer. The variations are (at
> > least):
> >
> > * type of count: public variable, accessor functions, base class;
> > * name of count/accessors (addref, AddRef, addRef, attach);
> > * initial value of the reference count (zero or one.)
> > * delete in the pointer or self-delete in release.
> >
> Still, boost could define at least one of these variations.

Sure. Which one? How many complaints will we get that _that one_ was more
appropriate?