Re: [boost] Re: Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-19 06:42:29

From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:a9mu42$c51$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> > Of
> > course, if we're going to make a full policy-based smart pointer,
> > why not just look at the strengths of both boost::smart_ptr and
> > Loki::SmartPtr, instead of cobbling it together in tiny pieces?
>
> Would be great. FWIW, (1) customizing Loki::SmartPtr for COM pointers
takes
> 6 lines of code, (2) there are few, if any significant features of boost's
> smart_ptr that is not being supported by Loki::SmartPtr's design, or
hasn't
> even been implemented already.

Did I miss some recent developments that allow Loki::SmartPtr to emulate
shared_ptr/shared_array/weak_ptr out of the box?