From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-21 17:02:38
I have (partly) followed the discussion about Jeff Garland's Date/Time
and studied the documentation, but not used the code in anger.
I conclude that this looks a good stab at an exceedingly difficult problem.
A perfect solution appears well-nigh impossible.
Only extensive real-life application is likely to refine our knowledge of
pros and cons
so I definitely vote for acceptance into Boost library.
(After all an important idea of Boost is to be a test-bed for future
library items. Users testing alone will prevent premature standardisation.
Dr Paul A Bristow, hetp Chromatography
LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830
Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-admin_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-admin_at_[hidden]]On
> Behalf Of Darin Adler
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 6:37 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] reminder about Date/Time formal review
> Just a quick reminder that the formal review period for the Date/Time
> library runs through Wednesday, April 24.
> If you've already commented on the library, please make sure that you
> said specifically whether or not you think the library should be
> accepted by Boost. Often people make extensive comments, but don't
> include their overall recommendation.
> Currently, I have comments from less than ten people, and very few clear
> yes/no votes.
> -- Darin
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk