From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-22 14:02:02
I haven't had much of a chance to play with it yet, but my initial
reaction is that I don't think it is ready for acceptance. At the
very minimum, I'd expect to see some locale support rather than
the hard coded names in English I found in greg_month.cpp!
I also have reservations because it seems too large and complex
given how little it seems to deliver.
Finally, I'm not sure that I agree with the design premise, i.e.,
that the calendars should be part of the date type. It seems to
me that dates should be calendar-independent and the calendar
should only come into play for I/O and operations on the date.
If date is to be a template, I suggest that the template
parameter(s) should only be used to specify precision and range.
I'd really like to see some more discussion, and perhaps some
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk