Re: [boost] Re: [boost] Curaçao: reaction to smart pointer

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-30 19:50:57

"Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:3B46B3BC-5C81-11D6-
> 1.  template typedef's are a probable future language feature.  Assuming
> we have that, how does that change the picture?  Are there unforeseen
> issues with template typedef's that will make them more or less useful
> than expected?

It may simplify design of smart_ptr a bit and also would be of great help in
defining hares_ptr, scoped_ptr  ... in terms od policy-based smart_ptr

> 2.  How will the introduction of move semantics affect smart pointers?

sorry gor my ignorance, but could you clarify on 'move semantics' and how
does it affect smart_ptr interface?

> Howard

Gennadiy.