Re: [boost] Re: Should boost::any::any() be made explicit?

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-30 19:59:49

I don't think we have any formal notion of a library maintainer at
Boost. Perhaps we should? Maybe it we should label libraries "stable but
unmaintained" if their maintainers become unresponsive? Maybe
unmaintained libraries should be "up for maintenance grabs" after a
certain amount of time has passed?

Thoughts?

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Harris (TT)" <john.harris_at_[hidden]>

> Is the author/maintainer of boost::any out there?  Is this problem not
> worthy of anyone's reply?  As it is, I have to modify boost source to
get my
> code to work.  We want boost::any ctor to be "explicit"...that's it.
>
> john harris
> trading technologies