Re: [boost] Re: Should boost::any::any() be made explicit?

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-30 21:31:47

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 08:59 pm, you wrote:
> I don't think we have any formal notion of a library maintainer at
> Boost. Perhaps we should? Maybe it we should label libraries "stable but
> unmaintained" if their maintainers become unresponsive? Maybe
> unmaintained libraries should be "up for maintenance grabs" after a
> certain amount of time has passed?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Dave

I think this is a good idea. If nothing else, it gives users some direction 
when asking for bug fixes/features. It can be quite disappointing when your 
bug reports are redirected to /dev/null, and Boost would serve its users well 
by avoiding that.

        Doug