[boost] Re: Smart pointer poll

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 14:49:50

"Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:011101c1f2d9$ba006e60$0f00a8c0_at_fernandoc...
[snip]
> The bottom line is that I don't think that a policy-based design, which
> gives maximum flexibility, should imply that well-though packages
shouldn't
> also be provided.

I'd like to ask you a question - do you see the inner typedef solution
"ptr<T>::some_impl" acceptable for these well-thought-ouy packages?

Andrei