Re: [boost] Re: Smart pointer poll

From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 15:30:17

From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> 
> I'd like to ask you a question - do you see the inner typedef solution
> "ptr<T>::some_impl" acceptable for these well-thought-ouy packages?

No, because, as Peter pointed out, I can't write

  template <class T>
  void f( ptr<T>::some_impl p );

Mark