From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 18:25:36
Mark Rodgers wrote:
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> > To break cycles. If you never need to break cycles, you're likely to not
> > find it very useful. ;-)
> I do need to break cycles, but when I do, I normally just use a plain
> pointer. How is a weak_ptr better?
You can test the weak_ptr::use_count() to see if weak_ptr::get() points to
a deleted object.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk