From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-13 11:38:10
"Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> By the way, the reason I used BCB, instead of BCC, was that I a
> while ago posted about porting to the compiler, on c.l.c++.m.,
> where I called it Borland C++ 6.0, and someone pointed out that
> Borland C++ only went up to version 5.02, and after that, it was
> called Borland C++ Builder, with or without using the IDE.
> This also appears from their homepage.
This is true, but "Borland C++ X.x" is a product name, as is
"Borland C++Builder", whereas, "bcc" is the name of the compiler
itself. And if you notice, the bcc version for BCB 5 is 5.5.x, and the
version for BCB 6 is 5.6.x.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk