From: Terje Slettebø (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-13 13:29:49
>From: "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]>
> "Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > [...]
> > By the way, the reason I used BCB, instead of BCC, was that I a
> > while ago posted about porting to the compiler, on c.l.c++.m.,
> > where I called it Borland C++ 6.0, and someone pointed out that
> > Borland C++ only went up to version 5.02, and after that, it was
> > called Borland C++ Builder, with or without using the IDE.
> > This also appears from their homepage.
> This is true, but "Borland C++ X.x" is a product name, as is
> "Borland C++Builder", whereas, "bcc" is the name of the compiler
> itself. And if you notice, the bcc version for BCB 5 is 5.5.x, and the
> version for BCB 6 is 5.6.x.
Yes, I've noticed. :) Ok.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk