From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-21 05:16:00
David White wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 19:20, Daniel Frey wrote:
> > Whether distance_type is signed or unsigned should be looked up in the
> > standard, but I don't have the standard :) Anyway we shouldn't guess if
> > we can know. If you have the standard, can you please check it?
> The standard, in 23.1, table 65 lists difference_type as a container
> member as being a "signed integral type". size_type on the other hand,
> is listed as being an "unsigned integral type".
Slightly OT: Both Dave and me wrote "distance_type" again. I know it's
wrong but I see it all the time. Seems difference_type (the correct
name) is not very intuitive, is it? :)
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk