Re: [boost] BLL for other compilers than GCC and Kai C++

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-24 16:12:22

At 03:30 PM 5/24/2002, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:

 >> >Have you had any luck figuring out what options are required to make
 >>Intel
 >> >6.0 act like a standards conforming compiler?
 >>
 >> I started testing out the options, but as there's a lot of them, and I
 >had
 >> some school stuff to attend to, now, I had to postpone the rest. I'll
 >resume
 >> the testing in June, when school is finished, and post the results to 
the
 >> list.
 >
 >The BLL tests seem to compile and run with Intel 6.0 without any
 >options (except for -Iboost). My icpc.cfg file has these defined
 >though:
 >
 >-tp p6
 >-long_double
 >
 >-D__int64="long long"
 >
 >Adding the options from boost/status/compiler.cfg for icc-strict seems to 

 >cause problems though. I haven't really played with the options yet.

Are you working with the Windows or Linux version of Intel 6.0?

I should have specified that Terje and I were working with the Windows 
version.  I'd like to get the full set of jam regression tests working for 
Lambda and everything else.

Actually, the regular intel-win32 toolset in CVS already "works" in the 
sense the compiles run, but a bunch of tests are failing, apparently 
because the default is to emulate the Microsoft compiler, bugs and all:-( 
That's what I was hoping someone has a workaround for.

--Beman