[boost] Re: boost 1.28 on solaris 2.8

From: Sam Rash (rash3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-31 16:48:09

This is the case even on the solaris gcc?  I am using that and NOT cc (the
workshop one).

"Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0205311619510.636-100000_at_zaphod.osl.iu.edu...
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Sam Rash wrote:
> rash3> /home/rash/install/boost_1_28_0/boost/integer_traits.hpp:109:
#error No
> rash3> WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX present, please adjust integer_traits<> for
your
> rash3> compiler.
>
> Looks like integer_traits needs to be ported to Solaris. Anyone volunteer
> to do this?
>
> rash3> I have noted the "fail" marker on the compiler status page for this
> rash3> compiler/OS.  However, I have been unable to find anything saying
> rash3> what can be changed to remedy the situation.  Does anyone have any
> rash3> tips?
>
> Once integer_traits is ported, you'll probably run into more problems.
> There's a bunch of boost code that is not ported to Solaris. The reason is
> that traditionally the Solaris compiler was so bad that it wasn't worth
> our time to try to port to it. The missing iterator_traits is a
> particularly glaring failure to be conformant.
>
> Anyone know what the latest status (conformance-wise) is on the Sun
> compiler?
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jeremy Siek                          http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
>  Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton   email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
>  C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)   office phone: [phone]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>