From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-13 05:41:36
From: "Pete Becker" <petebecker_at_[hidden]>
> At 09:23 AM 6/13/2002 +1000, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> >It seems like a good idea to just remove it from the next version of the
> >standard if there are no significant (or vocal) users of it
> Standards are about stability. The only thing that could be done along
> line would be to deprecate it in the next version of the standard, thus
> warning people that it might go away in the subsequent version of the
From: "Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]>
> Yes, I know of Metrowerks customers who use it, and depend on it being a
> packed bit representation.
The real question is: are there customers that use vector<T> in a generic
algorithm and depend on the fact that, when T = bool, they get something
that is radically different from the other vector instantiations?
The problem is not that vector<bool> is useless; the problem is that it
shadows the legitimate vector<bool> instantiation, and there is no way to
get that back. It should be renamed, not deprecated or removed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk