From: Terje Slettebø (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-18 06:26:08
>From: "James Curran" <JamesCurran_at_[hidden]>
> I'm writing an article describing some code where I use
> boost::shared_ptr<>. In the article, I plan on stating: "Considering it's
> general utility, and growing use, [shared_ptr] will almost certainly be
> added to the Standard Library when the next C++ Standard is complete
> 2005 or so), so it safe to start using now."
> How accurate do we feel that statement is?
Well, it's likely that auto_ptr will get company, in the revised standard
library. However, what form another smart pointer would have, is something
else. There's been discussion about policy-based smart pointers, as well.
Nevertheless, it's safe to use shared_ptr, of course, or anything else in
Boost, or another library. After all, you can use it, even if it's not in
the standard. Boost is widely regarded, anyway.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk