From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-18 08:06:31
I wasn't really concerned about the validity of the "safe to use" line,
as much as I was "almost certainly be added to the Standard Library" bit.
-- Truth, James Curran www.NovelTheory.com (Personal) www.NJTheater.com (Professional) www.aurora-inc.com (Day job) "Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:084301c216ba$f15e4350$60fb5dd5_at_pc... > Well, it's likely that auto_ptr will get company, in the revised standard > library. However, what form another smart pointer would have, is something > else. There's been discussion about policy-based smart pointers, as well. > > Nevertheless, it's safe to use shared_ptr, of course, or anything else in > Boost, or another library. After all, you can use it, even if it's not in > the standard. Boost is widely regarded, anyway.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk