From: Hendrik Schober (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-21 06:17:37
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> In my opinion, this decision hinders effective debugging so badly that it
> should be re-considered (If I knew how to write such a suggestion, I would
> certainly so do). [...]
> Think how _simple_ it would be to provide a "stack trace" if the stack were
> still intact!!
> Think of how much information would be available to a modern debugger!!
Mhmm. I don't see your point. This information _is_
available in the exception's ctor. You say things
would be a lot better if it was available in the
catch handler. Where's the difference?
Or is it that you're concerned about exception types
you have no control over? (I rarely had a problem
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk