RE: [boost] Problems with uBLAS and /Zm Option (VC7)

From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 04:45:24

I have now run all the uBLAS tests 1 to 6 in release as well as debug mode.

I slightly suspect that using pre-compiled headers causes the compiler heap
overflow C1060 with test6.  There is certainly something very funny about
the setting.  I now think that rebuild/clean causes a compiler reset so the
heap is cleared.

Smells like a memory leak in the compiler?  Surely not!

/Zm1000 IS sufficient for my tests. I only have 256Mbyte memory (Windows
2000).

Paul

Dr Paul A Bristow, hetp Chromatography
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal, Cumbria
LA8 8AB      UK
[phone]
Mobile [phone]
mailto:pbristow_at_[hidden]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Martin Schuerch
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:41 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Problems with uBLAS and /Zm Option (VC7)
>
>
>
> Hi
> I tried to run the test programs of ublas under VC7. I used the converted
> workspace from the workspace of VC6.
> -> Compiler errors due memory limitations (1GB installed).
> The suggestion of the online help is to set a bigger number in the /Zm
> option.
> In the included projects a number of 1000 (2000 is maximum) is
> already set.
> Increasing the number doesn't help.
> Deleting the already set option does help for most test-files.
> For the other
> files a number of 500 will succeed.
> I would like to replace our home made matrix class with the uBLAS one
> (during the review). But have a little bit a bad feeling, because
> I wouldn't
> like to play around with the /Zm option in every file.
> Has anybody experience with this?
> Best regards
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>