Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Stefano Delli Ponti (stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 08:03:50

Next message: Simon J. Julier: "[boost] uBLAS gcc performance question"
Previous message: Phil Nash: "Re: [boost] shared_ptr/ intrusive_ptr"
In reply to: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "RE: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Next in thread: Greg Colvin: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Reply: Greg Colvin: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>
> If 'get_pointer' is going to become a free-standing equivalent of 'get'
> member function, I would suggest to call it 'c_ptr' (never liked 'get' :),

I think 'c_ptr' would be a very good choice.

Stefano Delli Ponti

Next message: Simon J. Julier: "[boost] uBLAS gcc performance question"
Previous message: Phil Nash: "Re: [boost] shared_ptr/ intrusive_ptr"
In reply to: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "RE: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Next in thread: Greg Colvin: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Reply: Greg Colvin: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk