From: Stefano Delli Ponti (stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 08:03:50
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>
> If 'get_pointer' is going to become a free-standing equivalent of 'get'
> member function, I would suggest to call it 'c_ptr' (never liked 'get' :),
I think 'c_ptr' would be a very good choice.
Stefano Delli Ponti
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk