|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 12:00:20
From: "Greg Colvin" <greg_at_[hidden]>
> >I think 'c_ptr' would be a very good choice.
>
> And I still like &*p better than p.get() or mumble_ptr(p).
Causes undefined behavior if p is a null pointer, though. :(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk