From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 15:12:31
We've discussed this before; the best forum for it would be
But to make a useful contribution here you'd need to propose a solution
which didn't put too much of a burden on boost developers, who generally
don't want to be bothered with carefully maintaining minimal dependencies.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maciej Sobczak" <maciej_at_[hidden]>
> Would it be justified to make some minimal version of Boost (or at least
> some part of it) for decent compilers? (kidding)
> I know that once the whole Boost gets included in C++0x (:-)), the
> problem will vanish - today nobody cares about the dependencies between
> standard headers - but at the moment it bothers me a bit.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk