From: Matthew Wilson (mwilson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 18:15:45
Developers don't want to be bothered with carefully maintaining minimal
dependencies. Are you serious? Are they?
"David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> We've discussed this before; the best forum for it would be
> But to make a useful contribution here you'd need to propose a solution
> which didn't put too much of a burden on boost developers, who generally
> don't want to be bothered with carefully maintaining minimal dependencies.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maciej Sobczak" <maciej_at_[hidden]>
> > Would it be justified to make some minimal version of Boost (or at least
> > some part of it) for decent compilers? (kidding)
> > I know that once the whole Boost gets included in C++0x (:-)), the
> > problem will vanish - today nobody cares about the dependencies between
> > standard headers - but at the moment it bothers me a bit.
> don't-worry-be-happy-ly y'rs,
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk